Re: [PATCH] revision: add --except option

> Am 8/31/2013 21:27, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> wrote:
>>> Am 8/30/2013 8:32, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>>> If you have a history where
>>>>
>>>>  - branches "master" and "maint" point at commit A;
>>>>  - branch "next" points at commit B that is a descendant of A; and
>>>>  - there are tags X and Y pointing at commits that are ahead of B
>>>>    or behind A
>>>>
>>>> i.e.
>>>>
>>>>       ----X----A----B----Y
>>>>
>>>> what are the desired semantics for these?
>>>
>>> I think the simplest were that --except trumps everything and means
>>> "whatever else I say, do as if I did not mention the following".
>>
>> Actually, my patch is almost there, I attach the necessary changed
>> below to make everything work. I've added debug prints to show what
>> it's actually doing:
>>
>>>>  (1) --branches --except maint
>>>
>>> => master next
>>
>> => master next
>>
>>>>  (2) --all --not --branches --except maint
>>>
>>> => X Y --not master next
>>
>> => ^master ^next X Y HEAD
>>
>>>>  (3) ^master next --except maint
>>>
>>> => ^master next
>>
>> => ^master next
>>
>>> (4) Y next --except master next --not --branches
>>>
>>> this => Y --not maint
>>> or this => Y --not maint master next
>>
>> => Y
>>
>> Remember that maint (or rather ^maint) is after --except.
>
> Sure, but why is it not in the result? maint is not even mentioned under
> --except. Confused...