Re: first parent, commit graph layout, and pull merge direction
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 23, 2013, 11:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s2zR7qYp58M_TqUqRNW24Ap5m5DsH4WWuHD3MiBu2Wg0A@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130522115042.GA20649@inner.h.apk.li>
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Hi everyone, > > I'm just looking into better displays of the commit graph (as > displayed with gitk, smartgit, fisheye) - they tend to quickly > dissolve into a heap of spaghetti. > > We had the idea that treating the first parent specially would > have some advantage here - including graphically indicating which > one of the parents of a commit is the first parent. (For instance, > by letting that line leave the commit node at the top/bottom, > and the other(s) to the side.)
I don't understand; gitk already shows the first parent starting from the bottom, and the merge commits arrive from the right side. What am I missing?
-- Felipe Contreras