Re: Thoughts on gitk's memory footprint over linux-2.6.git
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Am 11/11/2011 13:44, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
>> It would be nice to have --base option, and show only the commits
>> <base>..<branch>.
>
> What's wrong with
>
> gitk master..branch_1 branch_2 branch_3 branch_4 branch_5
> or
> gitk --branches --not master
>
> ? (I do that all the time.) Recall that 'master..branch_1' is short for
> '^master branch_1'. It is sufficient to specify the negative ref, ^master,
> only once.
Ah, nice! Thanks a lot :)
--
Felipe Contreras