From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:04:27 GMT
Subject: Re: Thoughts on gitk's memory footprint over linux-2.6.git
Message-ID: <CAMP44s2tjeQAq+WuAepwvcY74X1af_pPjH4PSbe-Q=OuuAucWg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EBD2EFF.1010000@viscovery.net>

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> wrote:
> Am 11/11/2011 13:44, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
>> It would be nice to have --base option, and show only the commits
>> <base>..<branch>.
>
> What's wrong with
>
>     gitk master..branch_1 branch_2 branch_3 branch_4 branch_5
> or
>     gitk --branches --not master
>
> ? (I do that all the time.) Recall that 'master..branch_1' is short for
> '^master branch_1'. It is sufficient to specify the negative ref, ^master,
> only once.

Ah, nice! Thanks a lot :)

-- 
Felipe Contreras