Re: [PATCH 0/9] transport-helper: updates

> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Some of these were were sent before and rejected without a
>> reason,...
>
> Earlier, you were asked to leave because many constructive criticism
> or suggestion for improvement to your patches in reviews led to
> stubborn resistance, ended up wasting everybody's time and left a
> bad atmosphere on the list.
>
> It seems that Matthew is trying to see if you can work better with
> others than before after a break, but I personally am not hopeful
> yet and do not want to waste my/our time on flamewars like we saw in
> the past.
>
> So I'll look at these and may pick patches that are obviously and
> trivially good, but will refrain from asking clarifications and
> suggesting improvements, etc. on other patches that I suspect will
> end up wasting the time of people again.  Do not take silence from
> me as a silent agreement.