Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] remote-hg: force remote push
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 4, 2013, 18:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s22KDoWVApwnVcGBH=EVDV+wnCQUAdEp=SRLQeb9E0J=g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vip42jldt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes: > >> Ideally we shouldn't do this, as it's not recommended in mercurial >> documentation, but there's no other way to push multiple bookmarks (on >> the same branch), which would be the behavior most similar to git. >> >> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> >> --- > > In the previous round you wanted me to exclude this one to force > split head at the remote, and I saw you and Max Horn discussing > (rather, shouting at each other ;-) why it is needed/desirable.
No, that was "don't update bookmarks unnecessarily", and it seems you skipped it appropriately.
> Have you changed your mind and you want this as part of the series, > or is it just you forgot to exclude it?
Nope, I still see no reason not to push this.
-- Felipe Contreras