From: Felipe Contreras Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:56:39 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] remote-hg: force remote push Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vip42jldt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Felipe Contreras writes: > >> Ideally we shouldn't do this, as it's not recommended in mercurial >> documentation, but there's no other way to push multiple bookmarks (on >> the same branch), which would be the behavior most similar to git. >> >> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras >> --- > > In the previous round you wanted me to exclude this one to force > split head at the remote, and I saw you and Max Horn discussing > (rather, shouting at each other ;-) why it is needed/desirable. No, that was "don't update bookmarks unnecessarily", and it seems you skipped it appropriately. > Have you changed your mind and you want this as part of the series, > or is it just you forgot to exclude it? Nope, I still see no reason not to push this. -- Felipe Contreras