Re: [PATCH 1/5] t1508 (at-combinations): more tests; document failures
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 2, 2013, 17:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s1yMR5zrWycdfrToTUQ1j_aTFbySgn_gvROAvjUH1eN-g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0m=gmf9g_O3uHmpGkSa165G-5VGROTgjQx87XwvDDQKSg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Felipe Contreras wrote: >> Your approach can NOT be documented. > > Ah, I missed that. The explanation I was looking for is: > > HEAD has been special right from the start, and we cannot elevate > anything else to its status now.
We can, but do we _need_ to? Adding another magical symbolic ref that has limited scope should not be a huge task, as the effects can be documented, but another magical symbolic ref that does *exactly* the same as HEAD would require too many changes in the code and documentation it's not even worth considering, especially if we don't _need_ to.
-- Felipe Contreras