Re: [PATCH 02/12] completion: simplify __gitcomp
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 8, 2012, 14:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s1hmG_xMjeB_Wv8pU=aPt=QK27R1OsePeeH5TK9w2GCqg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120408143621.GA2631@burratino>
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> (dropping Shawn from cc since I'm not under the impression he works > on the completion script these days) > Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> Whoa! Breaking their tab completion? Where? Can you show me some evidence? > > If you weren't listening before, I'm not sure what I can add now[*].
This is what you said; "in exchange for us breaking their tab completion". There's a big difference between "breaking", and "*potentially* breaking". I have never seen any evidence of tab completion actually being broken.
Show 6 quoted lines
> Luckily, I already said what I needed to say. Yes, cleanups can be > good when they don't break things, and no, cleanups that break things > are not good. Sometimes it is not obvious which category each case > falls into. As you well know, "tests pass" is not enough (e.g., > sometimes there are no tests!). If you want someone to argue with, > you can find someone else.
Fortunately there's no evidence of anything being broken; all the issues mentioned are *theoretical*, and there's not even an example of a custom completion that would be broken by this.
-- Felipe Contreras