Re: [PATCH 0/2] remote-helpers: test fixes

From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: May 20, 2013, 22:53 UTC
Message-ID: <CAMP44s0gK5EgD-pJb1NVrpJvYeyXmN_nS6MT7renFHhne1cZJg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vd2sltgj4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've setup a project in Travis CI for continuous integration with very good
>> results, however, I had to apply a couple of fixes.
>>
>> I'm not sure if this is v1.8.3 material, but here they are.
>
> Thanks; I'll queue them at the tip of fc/remote-hg to graduate soon
> after 1.8.3, then.

No, they should be graduated first. The tip of fc/remote-hg is in pu, no? I have rebased that branch and squashed some fixes so every commit works on all versions of Mercurial. I will resend all the patches, the only reason I haven't done so is that I didn't want to create more noise before v1.8.3, and you said I was the one taking the decision when to merge remote-helper stuff to master.

So this should go to master, the rest of fc/remote-hg should be dropped, I can resend any time, and I suppose after v1.8.3 is the best time.

-- 
Felipe Contreras