Re: Branches & directories
- From
Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 18, 2011, 05:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMOZ1BsZvXsnnWAPXR7UGKdqOMwuGB-ffaAPk55U_1dcjZUcDw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAE1pOi3rqqcz_6QxB8=g2jWOF-4SRZee7t8NXN1md2C4DL7wug@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:23, Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be really nice, though, if Git could somehow > "stash" such files when checking out a different branch. In general, I > would prefer if uncommitted changes and untracked and/or ignored files > stuck to the branch where they were created.
As an aside, the problem here is likely a manifestation of the fact that nobody understands what a branch is; the word 'branch' is TERRIBLE, as everyone has a different idea for what that should mean. In my opinion, `git branch' should become `git ref' or the like.
One of git's worst faults is that a complicated and imprecise interface has been draped over a very simple and precise underlying structure.