Re: Branches & directories
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 19, 2011, 00:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110819001301.GA32743@elie.gateway.2wire.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMOZ1BsZvXsnnWAPXR7UGKdqOMwuGB-ffaAPk55U_1dcjZUcDw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Michael,
Michael Witten wrote:
> As an aside, the problem here is likely a manifestation of the fact > that nobody understands what a branch is
I agree with Michael J Gruber that this is not the useful kind of hyperbole.
In olden times, there was more talk of the refs in the refs/heads/ hierarchy as being branch heads which point to the tip of a particular branch of history. That is still exactly what they are. By abuse of language, people sometimes use the term "branch" as a synonym when there is little risk of confusion.
If you have found tutorial documentation that is confusing on this point, by all means, fix it. You are talking as though a documentation bug is a fundamental design flaw that cannot be fixed by the likes of you and me.