Re: [PATCH] convert: clarify line ending conversion warning

>
> Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Rephrase the warning to be clear that line endings have not been changed
> > in the working directory but will be changed on the next checkout, and
> > explicitly say which line endings the file currently has in the working
> > directory.
> >
> > Example commands to trigger the warning on Linux:
> >
> > git config core.autocrlf true
> > echo 'Hello world!' > hello.txt
> > git add hello.txt
> > git commit -m "Add hello.txt"
>
> While the "example" does not hurt, because the log message is not
> executable, it would not help to its potential unless you add its
> expected output to go with it.
>
>     On a platform whose native line endings are not CRLF
>     (e.g. Linux), the "git add" step in the sequence triggers the
>     waring in question.
>
>     $ git config core.autocrlf true
>     $ echo 'Hello world!' >hello.txt
>     $ git add hello.txt
>     warning: LF will be replaced by CRLF in hello.txt
>     The file will have its original line endings in your working directory
>
> or something like that.
>
> I think the recent trend is to enclose end-user supplied strings
> (like misspelt option names, arguments to options, and pathnames)
> inside single quote, so
>
>     warning: LF will be replaced by CRLF in 'hello.txt'.
>
> would probably be a good idea, on top of what you are aiming for.
> Also, in a multi-sentence warning message like this, I do not think
> it makes sense to omit the end-of-sentence full-stop.

> I have mixed feelings with this change, even though I agree that the
> original is not good.  The first sentence of the updated text
> already says that right now, the file ends with CRLF, and that the
> conversion happen the next time you check out the file to the
> working tree.  And that makes "For now ... still" totally redundant.
>
> Perhaps a single sentence, nothing more than
>
>         warning: in '%s', CRLF will be replaced by LF the next time
>         you check it out
>
> is sufficient?  I dunno.