Re: [BUG] Highly inconsistent diff UI
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 24, 2013, 23:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0ntZKaEzA0Jupj6poOMydqUumEGVVJ-uhBE12sPJ0ntjw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0=NWSZsARu9w0DwpEmJHKnvpB8yoNfEa31LDQA=cV-90Q@mail.gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Ofcourse, I now see that this is probably useless, and .. fits my bill.
Would you find it potentially useful? You do a lot of merging back-and-fourth juggling feature branches, pu, next, master.
> When packaged with a good default for LHS (which .. currently doesn't > have), it might be a slightly better candidate. I was thinking origin > instead of [nearest-fork-commit].
Er, I meant HEAD@{u}, not origin. HEAD@{u}~HEAD doesn't sound like a bad default at all.