From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 23:17:45 GMT
Subject: Re: [BUG] Highly inconsistent diff UI
Message-ID: <CALkWK0ntZKaEzA0Jupj6poOMydqUumEGVVJ-uhBE12sPJ0ntjw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0=NWSZsARu9w0DwpEmJHKnvpB8yoNfEa31LDQA=cV-90Q@mail.gmail.com>

Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Ofcourse, I now see that this is probably useless, and .. fits my bill.

Would you find it potentially useful?  You do a lot of merging
back-and-fourth juggling feature branches, pu, next, master.

> When packaged with a good default for LHS (which .. currently doesn't
> have), it might be a slightly better candidate.  I was thinking origin
> instead of [nearest-fork-commit].

Er, I meant HEAD@{u}, not origin.  HEAD@{u}~HEAD doesn't sound like a
bad default at all.