Re: Itches with the current rev spec
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 25, 2013, 11:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0n67c203tLWYvCi9qiMtBo2ZOkKLYbsqFC1ukwz0CLEuw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s3P02yFoi64j5aROQm69O4NGzvzxONyEjkpvLzW-GTenA@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Yeah, probably fine, but I would also like H~1.
You can get that now using `git symbolic ref H HEAD`. I'm wondering if we can do better than hard-interpreting HEAD as H at the rev-parse level.