From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:06:17 GMT
Subject: Re: Itches with the current rev spec
Message-ID: <CALkWK0n67c203tLWYvCi9qiMtBo2ZOkKLYbsqFC1ukwz0CLEuw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s3P02yFoi64j5aROQm69O4NGzvzxONyEjkpvLzW-GTenA@mail.gmail.com>

Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Yeah, probably fine, but I would also like H~1.

You can get that now using `git symbolic ref H HEAD`.  I'm wondering
if we can do better than hard-interpreting HEAD as H at the rev-parse
level.