Re: git-subtree
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 5, 2012, 15:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0k+AwCsizZFwbKKxuz0B4xLoyC4hAy3WRD=sLCq-HvvCw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87ipkq199w.fsf@smith.obbligato.org>
Hi again,
[+CC: Junio Hamano, our maintainer]
David A. Greene wrote:
> I've read that document. The issue is that I didn't develop the code, > Avery did.
Not an issue as long as you have Avery's signoff.
> It's a lot of time to learn a > completely new codebase. I was hoping to submit something soon and then > learn the codebase gradually during maintenance/further development.
We certainly don't want badly reviewed code that nobody understands floating around in the codebase- so, I'd suggest sending out whatever you think is appropriate for the first round of reviews, and see how things shape up from there.
> How have completely new tools be introduced into the git mainline in the > past?
Yes. For an example of something I was involved with but didn't author, see vcs-svn/.
-- Ram