Re: [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 7, 2014, 20:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0=vXGiHbd__ZNfp42fRS_gK5MNmYx13=uzDfc0m==V5Fw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq8uurcyw2.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I do not mind allowing laziness by defaulting to something, but I am
> not enthused by an approach that adds the new variable whose value
> is questionable. The description does not justify at all why
> @{upstream} is not a good default (unless the workflow is screwed up
> and @{upstream} is set to point at somewhere that is _not_ a true
> upstream, that is).Did you find the explanation I gave in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/240077 reasonable? I don't know why label the respin-workflow as being "screwed up".