Re: [PATCH 2/5] interpret_branch_name: factor out upstream handling
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 8, 2014, 12:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0=YQVSnip27-MbB0ASZ_9AMF-ZxuPzP73wWEhxwdZYqJg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20140108093450.GB15720@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
> sha1_name.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
Thanks. I applied this to my series as-it-is.