Re: [PATCH 05/16] remote: remove dead code in read_branches_file()
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 23, 2013, 08:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0=pgivbq0D3Q29H4+RM77s67EALharbVCwAGFqjBPQgwQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vhagpfdwp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
>>> Reminds me of the strategy to deprecate functionality in X (cf. >>> http://lwn.net/Articles/536520/) ;-) >> >> Leaving dead code around to confuse readers? :\ > > We broke the use case to access jgarzik/netdev-2.6 only by having > jgarzik remote accidentally, and waited for quite a while (since > early 2008 until now) to see if anobody screamed. Nobody did. We > now know we can remove that feature.
Did we _not_ leave dead code around to confuse readers (no comment or log message indicating intent), or am I missing something?
> That is exactly what Keith is describing, isn't it?
Wasn't that a joke?