Re: [PATCH 4/8] rebase: prepare to do generic housekeeping
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 10, 2013, 16:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0=hK4Nj24xEYtfnAmrLsKLz+iJXvM4PKL9NHEJDS35mfQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vvc6q3l6t.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> So it is either (1) the added code is unreachable and unexercised at > this point in the series, or
Yeah, it's (1).
> Perhaps this should come a bit later in the series?
When exactly? I picked up on your suggestion to separate out the preparation-for-$backend-to-return step. The next three patches convert each of the $backend scripts to return.
> At least the log message should mention that this is adding an > unreachable cruft at this step, if the order is to be kept.
Okay, I can update the commit message.