Re: [PATCH 10/15] for-each-ref: introduce format specifier %>(*) and %<(*)
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 5, 2013, 08:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0=9X6QhCOPfV6Gq31VVccyDoO3ciPxG+2kqpgL2foiQSw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8A2h0pjZ759NpByrEJYzg3ETyDkUGTptC-FFkeZCpGSbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Duy Nguyen wrote:
> I mentioned it before and I do it again. This is not optimal.
Yeah, I'll attempt to fix this, but it's not urgent.
> But I guess it's ok in this > shape unless you run this over hundreds of refs.
Oh, you can run over a hundred refs just fine, for scripting purposes; but why would you want to run over a hundred refs with a pretty that includes %>(*) or %<(*)?