From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:14:05 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] for-each-ref: introduce format specifier %>(*) and %<(*)
Message-ID: <CALkWK0=9X6QhCOPfV6Gq31VVccyDoO3ciPxG+2kqpgL2foiQSw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8A2h0pjZ759NpByrEJYzg3ETyDkUGTptC-FFkeZCpGSbQ@mail.gmail.com>

Duy Nguyen wrote:
> I mentioned it before and I do it again. This is not optimal.

Yeah, I'll attempt to fix this, but it's not urgent.

> But I guess it's ok in this
> shape unless you run this over hundreds of refs.

Oh, you can run over a hundred refs just fine, for scripting purposes;
but why would you want to run over a hundred refs with a pretty that
includes %>(*) or %<(*)?