Re: importance of .git extension for bare repos
- From
Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 16, 2012, 01:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALUzUxqEirjnCBHt28dwcgTBqC+u0wydNsnVR1rgyGG0-R_M1w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <jhhkn8$a0t$1@dough.gmane.org>
I don't believe its significant to git itself, it's just a convention for us humans.
-- Cheers, Ray Chuan On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Neal Kreitzinger <neal@rsss.com> wrote: > I have a user who has created bare repos without naming them with the .git > extension. As a result, the file paths are MYBARE/config instead of > MYBARE.git/config, etc. Is this a supported naming convention for bare > repos in git.git, or is it going to have some problems? > > v/r, > neal > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html