From: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:38:08 GMT
Subject: Re: importance of .git extension for bare repos
Message-ID: <CALUzUxqEirjnCBHt28dwcgTBqC+u0wydNsnVR1rgyGG0-R_M1w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <jhhkn8$a0t$1@dough.gmane.org>

I don't believe its significant to git itself, it's just a convention
for us humans.

-- 
Cheers,
Ray Chuan


On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Neal Kreitzinger <neal@rsss.com> wrote:
> I have a user who has created bare repos without naming them with the .git
> extension.  As a result, the file paths are MYBARE/config instead of
> MYBARE.git/config, etc.  Is this a supported naming convention for bare
> repos in git.git, or is it going to have some problems?
>
> v/r,
> neal
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html