Re: [PATCH v2] t4253-am-keep-cr-dos: avoid using pipes
- From
LI, BO XUAN <liboxuan@connect.hku.hk>
- Date
- May 8, 2019, 16:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALM0=-mDhCqfL0XpaH27cHxcfRq1Y2xJQ=GQLCVdACsOHj0hiA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqv9ylh4wl.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
Understood. Thanks for the clarification.
Best regards, Boxuan Li
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 1:49 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> > "LI, BO XUAN" <liboxuan@connect.hku.hk> writes: > > > Thanks for your review! I can understand your point, but I've got a > > quick question: > > > > What if format-patch really breaks and 'am' magically does not break? > > Doesn't that indicate that you are not testing the result of "am" > adequately? > > I am not saying it is *wrong* to split the pipe into two. I am > merely saying that it is borderline Meh, as the primary point of > these two tests are to see how the command downstream of the pipe > behaves and not the upstream one.