Re: [PATCH 09/15] refs.c: only write reflog update if msg is non-NULL
- From
Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
- Date
- Oct 28, 2014, 19:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAL=YDWkZE0KXrM+SqL1gZoQR_u7kcvWjQfton7AoavfptqcM4w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq8uk6skky.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> writes: > >> commit 020ed65a12838bdead64bc3c5de249d3c8f5cfd8 upstream. >> >> When performing a reflog transaction update, only write to the reflog iff >> msg is non-NULL. This can then be combined with REFLOG_TRUNCATE to perform >> an update that only truncates but does not write. > > Does any existing caller call this codepath with update->msg == NULL? > > Will "please truncate" stay to be the only plausible special cause > to call into this codepath without having any meaningful message? > > I am trying to make sure that this patch is not painting us into a > corner where we will find out another reason for doing something > esoteric in this codepath but need to find a way other than setting > msg to NULL for the caller to trigger that new codepath. Put it in > another way, please convince me that a new boolean field in update, > e.g. update->truncate_reflog, is way overkill for this.
This change only affects whether or not a reflog entry will be emitted by the update. msg==NULL means we will not create a new entry. This is orthogonal to whether we truncate the log or not.
In order to truncate the reflog we do have a boolean in update->flags & REFLOG_TRUNCATE which determines whether the update will truncate the log or not.
I see these two actions a) write a log entry and b) truncate the log as orthogonal and thus think we should have separate knobs for them.
Currently, modulo bugs, the only caller that will use msg==NULL is when we do reflog truncations. Thus that codepath BOTH sets msg==NULL (to not write a new log entry) and also sets update->flags&REFLOG_TRUNCATE (to truncate the log).
Having separate knobs for the two actions allow us the current behaviour with: msg==NULL update->flags&REFLOG_TRUNCATE
but it will also allow a caller to do things like msg="truncated by foo because ..." update->flags&REFLOG_TRUNCATE
If there is some future usecase where we want to truncate the log and then also generate a new initial log entry for the new log.
I will work on the commit message to make the distinction between msg==NULL and update->flags&REFLOG_TRUNCATE more clear.
thanks ronnie sahlberg
Show 38 quoted lines
>
>>
>> Change-Id: I44c89caa7e7c4960777b79cfb5d339a5aa3ddf7a
>> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> refs.c | 5 +++--
>> refs.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
>> index d54c3b9..f14b76e 100644
>> --- a/refs.c
>> +++ b/refs.c
>> @@ -3895,8 +3895,9 @@ int transaction_commit(struct transaction *transaction,
>> update->reflog_fd = -1;
>> continue;
>> }
>> - if (log_ref_write_fd(update->reflog_fd, update->old_sha1,
>> - update->new_sha1,
>> + if (update->msg &&
>> + log_ref_write_fd(update->reflog_fd,
>> + update->old_sha1, update->new_sha1,
>> update->committer, update->msg)) {
>> error("Could write to reflog: %s. %s",
>> update->refname, strerror(errno));
>> diff --git a/refs.h b/refs.h
>> index 5075073..bf96b36 100644
>> --- a/refs.h
>> +++ b/refs.h
>> @@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ int transaction_delete_ref(struct transaction *transaction,
>> /*
>> * Append a reflog entry for refname. If the REFLOG_TRUNCATE flag is set
>> * this update will first truncate the reflog before writing the entry.
>> + * If msg is NULL no update will be written to the log.
>> */
>> int transaction_update_reflog(struct transaction *transaction,
>> const char *refname,