git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH v2] ls-files: add pathspec matching for submodules

From
BWBrandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Date
Sep 20, 2016, 21:03 UTC
Message-ID
<CAKoko1qS0+DgnMeNnjayEK3sWnvpuiS4oRDBSR=6s8i4okQ_Hw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<CAKoko1oU+QR61Vy0eSxaRe_w8u4q_bC9gx9H7oMqH=CwNzBVCA@mail.gmail.com>
Show 28 quoted lines
>>> +
>>> +     if (item->flags & PATHSPEC_ONESTAR) {
>>> +             return WM_MATCH;
>>> +     } else if (item->magic & PATHSPEC_GLOB) {
>>> +             return wildmatch(pattern, string,
>>> +                              WM_PATHNAME |
>>> +                              (item->magic & PATHSPEC_ICASE ?
>>> +                               WM_CASEFOLD : 0),
>>> +                              NULL);
>>
>> Isn't this last one overly tight?  I am wondering about a scenario
>> where you have a submodule at "sub/" in the superproject, and "sub/"
>> has a "file" at the top of its working tree.  And you do:
>>
>>         git ls-files --recurse-submodules ':(glob)??b/fi?e'
>>
>> at the top of the superproject.  The "pattern" would be '??b/fi?e"
>> while string would be 'sub', and wildmatch() would not like it, but
>> there is no way for this caller to append anything to 'sub' before
>> making this call, as it hasn't looked into what paths appear in the
>> submodule repository (and it should not want to).  And I think we
>> would want it to recurse to find sub/file.  IOW, this looks like a
>> false negative we must avoid in this function.  As we cannot afford
>> to check if anything that matches 'fi?e' is in the index file of the
>> submodule repository, we shouldn't try to match 'fi?e' portion of
>> the given pathspec pattern.
>
> good point.  Let me think about this some more.

On a similar but slightly different note. In general do we want the pathspec '??b' to match against the sib/ directory and subsequently have ls-files print all entries inside of the sib/ directory? (this is in the non-recursive case)

Previous: Brandon WilliamsNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 22 of 25 in “[RFC] extending pathspec support to submodules”
  1. Brandon WilliamsSep 14, 2016
  2. Heiko VoigtSep 15, 2016
  3. Brandon WilliamsSep 15, 2016
  4. Junio C HamanoSep 15, 2016
  5. Stefan BellerSep 15, 2016
  6. Heiko VoigtSep 16, 2016
  7. Brandon WilliamsSep 16, 2016
  8. ls-files: add pathspec matching for submodulesBrandon Williams, Sep 17, 2016
  9. Junio C HamanoSep 17, 2016
  10. Brandon WilliamsSep 18, 2016
  11. Junio C HamanoSep 19, 2016
  12. Brandon WilliamsSep 19, 2016
  13. Junio C HamanoSep 19, 2016
  14. Brandon WilliamsSep 19, 2016
  15. Junio C HamanoSep 19, 2016
  16. Brandon WilliamsSep 19, 2016
  17. Junio C HamanoSep 19, 2016
  18. Brandon WilliamsSep 19, 2016
  19. ls-files: add pathspec matching for submodulesBrandon Williams, Sep 19, 2016
  20. Junio C HamanoSep 19, 2016
  21. Brandon WilliamsSep 20, 2016
  22. Brandon WilliamsSep 20, 2016
  23. Junio C HamanoSep 21, 2016
  24. Junio C HamanoSep 21, 2016
  25. Junio C HamanoSep 19, 2016

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.