Re: [PATCH 1/2] ls-files: adding support for submodules

From: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Date: Sep 23, 2016, 16:16 UTC
Message-ID: <CAKoko1p+M3X_y+DH+65fUDRZjkiZrKE3Z-jjq=RSjqoi7He8pw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160923060643.3ubr5gn7qczzs2ut@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Show 5 quoted lines

> Yeah, a positive "I support this" flag would at least let us correctly
> flag errors, which is the best we can do. That won't work for
> non-builtins, but perhaps it is good enough in practice.
>
> -Peff

So it sounds like we agree that this prefix option should be pushed to the top level. The question is have we come to a consensus on what we should be calling the option? Leave it as submodule-prefix or do we need to come up with a different name?

-Brandon