Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix the order of consuming unpackLimit config settings.

>
> Taylor Santiago <taylorsantiago@google.com> writes:
>
> > Thank you! How would you like me to proceed? Should I submit the above as a
> > v2 of the earlier patch?
>
> There is nothing "above" as you seem to be top posting ;-)
>
> When somebody else helps by supplying an "squashable" patch, often
> people are expected to review it and then update their patch(es)
> using the given material to produce a v2.
>
> But as I said, the "squashable" one was only about the receive-pack
> side; even if you combined it with your original, tests for the
> fetch side were still missing, so it was not sufficient for a v2.
>
> As I didn't see your reply message (to which I am responding to)
> until now, mostly because it was dropped by the mailing list
> (perhaps it was an HTML e-mail from GMail or something???), I've
> further worked on the tests to cover the fetch side and sent out a
> full version (not a squashable, but just a replacement for the whole
> thing).  It is archived and viewable at
>
>   https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqpm3eh7f6.fsf@gitster.g
>
> Part of it is still your original patch, some material in its
> proposed commit log message was given by Peff, and the rest was
> written by me, so it carries names of three people.
>
> If the result looks acceptable to you, then saying "Yup, that looks
> good" would be the simplest answer to give to move things forward.
>
> Thanks.