Re: [PATCH] remote: align set-branches builtin usage and documentation
- From
Philip Jägenstedt <philip@foolip.org>
- Date
- Feb 18, 2012, 13:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAKHWUkY2ZNniJmhheHdxj4dzBLtY-+Pn4teAm2WE+0eTXYMYvg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1329563867-13283-1-git-send-email-philip@foolip.org>
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:17, Philip Jägenstedt <philip.jagenstedt@gmail.com> wrote:
> The order of [--add] <name> <branch>... was inconsistent > between builtin remote usage messages and git-remote.txt.
To clarify, it's the order of "git remote set-branches" that is inconsistent with the two instances the patch touches:
usage: git remote set-branches <name> <branch>... or: git remote set-branches --add <name> <branch>...
-- Philip Jägenstedt