From: Philip Jägenstedt <philip@foolip.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:11:44 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote: align set-branches builtin usage and documentation
Message-ID: <CAKHWUkY2ZNniJmhheHdxj4dzBLtY-+Pn4teAm2WE+0eTXYMYvg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1329563867-13283-1-git-send-email-philip@foolip.org>

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:17, Philip Jägenstedt
<philip.jagenstedt@gmail.com> wrote:

> The order of [--add] <name> <branch>... was inconsistent
> between builtin remote usage messages and git-remote.txt.

To clarify, it's the order of "git remote set-branches" that is
inconsistent with the two instances the patch touches:

usage: git remote set-branches <name> <branch>...
   or: git remote set-branches --add <name> <branch>...

-- 
Philip Jägenstedt