Re: git-scm.com website
- From
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Mar 9, 2015, 16:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAJo=hJt_PHMEdpfRA0EKQyoH4XhYh89tvajewM28pgxzZ9ONMg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87y4n6kvdu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
Show 28 quoted lines
> Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes: > >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber >> <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote: >>> >>> Since we're talking business: git-scm.com still looks a bit like a >>> ProGit/Github promotion site. I don't have anything against either, and >>> git-scm.com provides a lot of the information that users are looking >>> for, and that are hard to find anywhere else; it's a landing page. It >>> just does not look like a "project home". >> >> Yes, git-scm.com is a place to point people. > > It features "Companies & Projects Using Git" at the bottom. Not > "supporting" but "using". > > Linux is point 10 on that list. The first 6 items are Google, facebook, > Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Netflix. > > Even for an OpenSource project that does not buy into the Free Software > philosophy, that is a mostly embarrassing list of companies to advertise > for. > > Personally, I consider the recent migration of the Emacs repository to > Git a bigger endorsement but then that's me. > > It might make sense to reduce this list just to "Projects" since those > are actually more tangible and verifiable. Or scrap it altogether.
At the bottom of the git-scm.com page there is this blurb:
This open sourced site is hosted on GitHub. Patches, suggestions and comments are welcome
And that text contains a link to the GitHub repository[1] where anyone can propose modifications to the page. Unfortunately I don't know of anyone paying out contribution stipends for content changes made to git-scm.com.
[1] https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/blob/master/README.md#contributing