Re: git-scm.com website
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Mar 9, 2015, 17:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kY_Kb63C6fKeHHx52sEn8j-Ho62-dh97-J8irhjGxaBqA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAP2yMa+Bw0KCSz9YEtviZUykAp4jpdsEWSK-jRxtd9MjzjHKfg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> > > > It might make sense to reduce this list just to "Projects" since those > > are actually more tangible and verifiable. Or scrap it altogether. > Sorry, I disagree with this. I think it's helpful for people to see > some important corporations that are using it, since many people > coming to the page are doing research to figure out if they want to > switch to it in their companies. It also demonstrates that these large > companies are participating in the open source community and it may > help them decide to open source internal corporate projects as well, > which I think is beneficial to everyone.
Yeah I'd agree on that. I'd even go a step further and claim it would be best to show projects and companies coming from most different branches of business.
("Can I switch my business over to Git? Oh well only these internet hacker companies are using it, I -as an air drier firmware writer shop- cannot relate to, so I keep using RCS.")
Also looking at the open source projects, most of them seem to me as large-ish umbrella projects, so a smaller(?) project like emacs would be huge win to show off Git can work well with all kinds of projects.