Re: [PATCH 2/2] rebase -i: new option --name-rev
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
>>> On a general note: you are submitting a completely new feature touching
>>> a heavily-used tool (and code path) during -rc0 time. As a rule of
>>> thumb: Don't do that. [..]
Dominique Quatravaux <domq@google.com> writes:
>> Sorry about that, I skimmed Junio's "What's cooking in git.git (Mar
>> 2012, #03; Mon, 5)" and I thought I was in the "high value/damage
>> ratio" category.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Well, these days, nothing that comes without prior discussion on
> pain points before the feature freeze, be it from seasoned list
> regulars or from people new to this list, can be of so high-value
> that it cannot wait until the next cycle.
ACK. I'm cool with skipping a cycle, they are so fast anyways!
--
Dominique Quatravaux
+41 79 609 40 72
Dominique Quatravaux <domq@google.com>