Re: Avoiding broken Gitweb links and deleted objects
- From
Matt McClure <matthewlmcclure@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 22, 2013, 13:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAJELnLEOg+D+baAddJvDiYM=ej8PKsgi2MWH25enOijXa+bO_Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vfvxu3ivc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I think what I missed is that the same logic to ignore side branches > whose history gets cauterised with such an "ours" merge may apply to > an "ours" merge that people already make, but the latter may want to > take both histories into account. > > So I guess it is not such a great idea.
The particular proposed implementation? Or the broader idea to save loose commits more permanently? I'm still interested in a solution for the latter.
-- Matt McClure http://matthewlmcclure.com http://www.mapmyfitness.com/profile/matthewlmcclure