Re: Avoiding broken Gitweb links and deleted objects
- From
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
- Date
- May 10, 2013, 07:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <518C9BD8.90508@viscovery.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vzjw349y0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Am 5/10/2013 8:37, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> What if we teach "git rebase" to record, perhaps by default, an > "ours" merge on top of Y that takes the tree state of Y but has X as > its second parent, ...
Please let's not go that route...
-- Hannes