Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] config: correctly read worktree configs in submodules
- From
Matheus Tavares Bernardino <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
- Date
- Sep 1, 2020, 21:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAHd-oW6LA7Ovnu-e9c+WapF-e+JMichWZEetxmnbjCT_H6D0AQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200901024130.GA3332286@google.com>
Hi, Jonathan
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:41 PM Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> > Hi, > > Matheus Tavares wrote: > > > One of the steps in do_git_config_sequence() is to load the > > worktree-specific config file. Although the function receives a git_dir > > string, it relies on git_pathdup(), which uses the_repository->git_dir, > > to make the path to the file. Furthermore, it also checks that > > extensions.worktreeConfig is set through the > > repository_format_worktree_config variable, which refers to > > the_repository only. Thus, when a submodule has worktree-specific > > settings, a command executed in the superproject that recurses into the > > submodule won't find the said settings. > > I think the above goes out of order: it states the "how" before the > "what". Instead, a commit message should lead with the problem the > change aims to solve.
Thanks. I will reorder these two sections in the commit message.
Show 8 quoted lines
> Is the idea here that until this patch, we're only able to read > worktree config from a repository when extensions.worktreeConfig is > set in the_repository, meaning that > > - when examining submodule config in a process where the_repository > represents the superproject, we do not read the submodule's worktree > config even if extensions.worktreeConfig is set in the submodule, > unless the superproject has extensions.worktreeConfig set, and
Right.
Show 6 quoted lines
> - when examining submodule config in a process where the_repository > represents the superproject, we *do* read the submodule's worktree > config even if extensions.worktreeConfig is not set in the submodule, > if the superproject has extensions.worktreeConfig set, and > > ?
Right, but with one change: if extensions.worktreeConfig is not set in the submodule and it is set in the superproject, the *superproject's* worktree config is read (independently of which git_dir was given as argument).
Show 34 quoted lines
> That sounds like a serious problem indeed. Thanks for fixing it.
>
> > This will be especially important in the next patch: git-grep will learn
> > to honor sparse checkouts and, when running with --recurse-submodules,
> > the submodule's sparse checkout settings must be loaded. As these
> > settings are stored in the config.worktree file, they would be ignored
> > without this patch. So let's fix this by reading the right
> > config.worktree file and extensions.worktreeConfig setting, based on the
> > git_dir and commondir paths given to do_git_config_sequence(). Also
> > add a test to avoid any regressions.
>
> I see. I'm not sure that's more important than other cases, but I
> can understand if the problem was noticed in this circumstance. :)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
> > ---
> > config.c | 21 +++++++++---
> > t/helper/test-config.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > t/t2404-worktree-config.sh | 16 +++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
> > index 8db9c77098..c2d56309dc 100644
> > --- a/config.c
> > +++ b/config.c
> > @@ -1747,11 +1747,22 @@ static int do_git_config_sequence(const struct config_options *opts,
> > ret += git_config_from_file(fn, repo_config, data);
> >
> > current_parsing_scope = CONFIG_SCOPE_WORKTREE;
> > - if (!opts->ignore_worktree && repository_format_worktree_config) {
> > + if (!opts->ignore_worktree && repo_config && opts->git_dir) {
>
> Can we eliminate the repository_format_worktree_config global to save
> the next caller from the same problem?Hmm, I think it's possible, I will investigate it further.
Show 12 quoted lines
> > + struct repository_format repo_fmt = REPOSITORY_FORMAT_INIT;
> > + struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> > +
> > + read_repository_format(&repo_fmt, repo_config);
> > +
> > + if (!verify_repository_format(&repo_fmt, &buf) &&
> > + repo_fmt.worktree_config) {
>
> This undoes the caching the repository_format_worktree_config means to
> do. Can we cache the value in "struct repository" instead? That way,
> in the common case where we're reading the_repository, we wouldn't
> experience a slowdown.Yeah, that would be the best solution. But, unfortunately, do_git_config_sequence() doesn't receive a complete repository struct, just the 'commondir' and 'git_dir' strings.
Show 5 quoted lines
> > - char *path = git_pathdup("config.worktree");
> > + char *path = mkpathdup("%s/config.worktree", opts->git_dir);
>
> Can this use a helper like repo_git_path or strbuf_repo_git_path
> (preferably one using strbuf like the latter)?Hmm, here we would have the same problem of not having a 'struct repository' to pass to those functions :(
Show 42 quoted lines
> [...]
> > + strbuf_release(&buf);
> > + clear_repository_format(&repo_fmt);
> > }
> >
> > current_parsing_scope = CONFIG_SCOPE_COMMAND;
> > diff --git a/t/helper/test-config.c b/t/helper/test-config.c
> > index 61da2574c5..284f83a921 100644
> > --- a/t/helper/test-config.c
> > +++ b/t/helper/test-config.c
> > @@ -2,12 +2,19 @@
> > #include "cache.h"
> > #include "config.h"
> > #include "string-list.h"
> > +#include "submodule-config.h"
> >
> > /*
> > * This program exposes the C API of the configuration mechanism
> > * as a set of simple commands in order to facilitate testing.
> > *
> > - * Reads stdin and prints result of command to stdout:
> > + * Usage: test-tool config [--submodule=<path>] <cmd> [<args>]
> > + *
> > + * If --submodule=<path> is given, <cmd> will operate on the submodule at the
> > + * given <path>. This option is not valid for the commands: read_early_config,
> > + * configset_get_value and configset_get_value_multi.
>
> Nice!
>
> [...]
> > @@ -93,7 +102,18 @@ int cmd__config(int argc, const char **argv)
> > if (argc == 0)
> > goto print_usage_error;
> >
> > + if (skip_prefix(*argv, "--submodule=", &subrepo_path)) {
> > + argc--;
> > + argv++;
> > + if (argc == 0)
> > + goto print_usage_error;
> > + }
>
> Can this use the parse_options API?Right, it would make it easier to add more options in the future. There is only one consideration, though, about parse_options()'s exit codes on error, but more on that below...
Show 7 quoted lines
> > +
> > if (argc == 2 && !strcmp(argv[0], "read_early_config")) {
> > + if (subrepo_path) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, "Cannot use --submodule with read_early_config\n");
> > + return TC_USAGE_ERROR;
>
> Should this use die() or BUG()?The idea of using TC_USAGE_ERROR (129) here and not die() (128), was that some users of the test-config helper want to detect die() errors from the config machinery itself. So by using a different exit code, we can avoid false positives in these tests. Of course they should also be checking stderr/stdout, but there is at least one test which only checks the exit code. Rethinking about that now, instead of using different exit codes in test-config.c, should we adjust the tests to use `test_must_fail` and only check stderr/stdout? Then we could use die() (or BUG()) here, as you suggested, as well as the parse_options API in the snippet above. Does that sound reasonable?
Show 15 quoted lines
> > + }
> > read_early_config(early_config_cb, (void *)argv[1]);
> > return TC_SUCCESS;
> > }
> > @@ -101,8 +121,23 @@ int cmd__config(int argc, const char **argv)
> > setup_git_directory();
> > git_configset_init(&cs);
> >
> > + if (subrepo_path) {
> > + const struct submodule *sub;
> > + struct repository *subrepo = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*repo));
>
> nit: this could be scoped to cmd__config:
>
> struct repository subrepo = {0};OK, will do. Thanks
Show 13 quoted lines
> > +
> > + sub = submodule_from_path(the_repository, &null_oid, subrepo_path);
> > + if (!sub || repo_submodule_init(subrepo, the_repository, sub)) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, "Invalid argument to --submodule: '%s'\n",
> > + subrepo_path);
> > + free(subrepo);
> > + ret = TC_USAGE_ERROR;
>
> Likewise: I think may want to use die() or BUG() (and likewise for other
> USAGE_ERROR cases).
>
> Thanks and hope that helps,
> JonathanIt did :) Thanks a lot for the comments!