Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Filter-branch extend progress with a simple estimated time remaning
- From
- Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 30, 2015, 08:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAHYJk3TAUFT4qnD23ug4gw41PJH+Ncj8CKTsDJnn-PH5z3GoWA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CANy2qHdsd=nsg5OMyg3POaT-_H6PXwrycCSpzAQbJ9=oBmpR_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Gabor Bernat <bernat@primeranks.net> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> this can work instead of the data command for getting the time > elapsed, however for getting the actual date of a timestamp is not > possible generally; so I think I will just remove that part. > Bernát GÁBOR > > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote: >>> (Please don't top-post on this list.)
Ah, I got caught up on the ETA part. Do note that date +%s is also a gnu extension and won't work everywhere.
-- Mikael Magnusson