From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:14:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Filter-branch extend progress with a simple estimated time remaning
Message-ID: <CAHYJk3TAUFT4qnD23ug4gw41PJH+Ncj8CKTsDJnn-PH5z3GoWA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANy2qHdsd=nsg5OMyg3POaT-_H6PXwrycCSpzAQbJ9=oBmpR_w@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Gabor Bernat <bernat@primeranks.net> wrote:
> this can work instead of the data command for getting the time
> elapsed, however for getting the actual date of a timestamp is not
> possible generally; so I think I will just remove that part.
> Bernát GÁBOR
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
>>> (Please don't top-post on this list.)

Ah, I got caught up on the ETA part. Do note that date +%s is also a
gnu extension and won't work everywhere.

-- 
Mikael Magnusson