Re: Same test-path-utils behaves differently on different Windows systems
- From
Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 10, 2013, 20:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAHGBnuOHD1o1si9EMpi+qi=VDCvAgEQbLfNaVDfOS983E6AKuw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <52570860.3060503@kdbg.org>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
>> PS: I'm also quite unhappy about naming the function "mingw_path". The >> path mangling comes from MSYS, not MinGW, so if at all it should be >> named msys_path. But as the code for the "mingw_path" function does >> nothing either MSYS or MinGW related but just prints argv[2] as it was >> passed to main() it should probably simply called "print_path". > > You have a point here. If it were to change, "echo_path" would be my > preference.
I'll stick to "print_path" as it more closely resembles "pwd", *print* working directory.
-- Sebastian Schuberth