From: Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 20:47:04 GMT
Subject: Re: Same test-path-utils behaves differently on different Windows systems
Message-ID: <CAHGBnuOHD1o1si9EMpi+qi=VDCvAgEQbLfNaVDfOS983E6AKuw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52570860.3060503@kdbg.org>

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> wrote:

>> PS: I'm also quite unhappy about naming the function "mingw_path". The
>> path mangling comes from MSYS, not MinGW, so if at all it should be
>> named msys_path. But as the code for the "mingw_path" function does
>> nothing either MSYS or MinGW related but just prints argv[2] as it was
>> passed to main() it should probably simply called "print_path".
>
> You have a point here. If it were to change, "echo_path" would be my
> preference.

I'll stick to "print_path" as it more closely resembles "pwd", *print*
working directory.

-- 
Sebastian Schuberth