Re: [PATCH 0/5] bisect: Add support for a --no-checkout option.
- From
Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 1, 2011, 22:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAH3Anrqp3BVMpTz7DhYBL=9nt1F30_20t=FmcmdZHqMHLEqXqA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vvcuhhw96.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes: > >> It might become more important if someone ever writes a tool that does >> a bisection on the user's behalf. In this case, aborting the tool >> might leave the HEAD in, what appears to the user, a confused state. > > Yes, I would prefer a series without --use-this-ref-for-bisect-status and > then a follow-up series on top of it to add that as a separate feature. > > Thanks. >
Ok, I understand that you are not convinced that such a series is necessary and so may not integrate it at this point.
However, I will prepare one, just for the record.
In this hypothetical additional series, are you happy for --no-checkout to become a synonym for --update-ref=HEAD in the manner of v8? From a technical perspective, it doesn't seem necessary to duplicate the state variables and parameters.
jon.