Re: [PATCH 3/5] bisect: introduce --no-checkout[=<ref>] support into porcelain.

From: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Date: Jul 30, 2011, 14:34 UTC
Message-ID: <201107301634.33710.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
In-Reply-To: <1312014511-7157-4-git-send-email-jon.seymour@gmail.com>

On Saturday 30 July 2011 10:28:29 Jon Seymour wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

> diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
> index b2186a8..6c4e853 100755
> --- a/git-bisect.sh
> +++ b/git-bisect.sh
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>  USAGE='[help|start|bad|good|skip|next|reset|visualize|replay|log|run]'
>  LONG_USAGE='git bisect help
>          print this long help message.
> -git bisect start [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<pathspec>...]
> +git bisect start [--no=checkout[=<ref>]] [<bad> [<good>...]] [--]

s/--no=checkout/--no-checkout/

Show 9 quoted lines

> [<pathspec>...] reset bisect state and start bisection.
>  git bisect bad [<rev>]
>          mark <rev> a known-bad revision.
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ require_work_tree
>  _x40='[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]'
>  _x40="$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40"
> 
> +BISECT_NOCHECKOUT=$(test -f "${GIT_DIR}/BISECT_NOCHECKOUT" && cat
> "${GIT_DIR}/BISECT_NOCHECKOUT")

Is there a reason you use "${GIT_DIR}" instead of "$GIT_DIR" that is used everywhere else?

Thanks, Christian.