Re: git diff-tree commit detail bug in 2.0.2 and 2.0.3

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>>>> Yeah, I'm fine with a straight revert, too (I think it is fine to keep
>>>> in master, though). I think jk/alloc-commit-id is built right on top of
>>>> the original commit-slab topic, so it should be easy to do either way.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for dealing with it.
>>>
>>> Whatever we do, perhaps it is worth applying the test below on top?
>>
>> Yeah, thanks.  I think that is a good idea.  I was preparing a patch
>> to tuck your minimum reproduction at the end of 4202, but your version
>> and placement makes good sense.
>
> OK, I pushed out updated 'maint' and 'master'.  The former merges
> a rebased version of jk/alloc-commit-id in to make the "reorganize
> the way we manage the in-core commit data" topic, and the latter
> reverts the "Use SSE to micro-optimize a leaf function to check the
> format of a ref string".
>
> Please give them some quick sanity check.
>
> Thanks.