Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Lazy-load trees when reading commit-graph
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Apr 9, 2018, 17:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kbV3uM0mkOdnoUF+isGEg_uM-9SKQix96hyQOH1Mg9YNQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7930c9bf-4f24-2e76-b522-331a2e9ed5d5@gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 6:15 AM, Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> I don't understand how folding the patches makes the correctness clearer, > since the rename (1/4) is checked by the compiler and the Coccinelle script > (3/4) only works after that rename is complete. > > The only thing I can imagine is that it makes smaller patch emails, since > there is only one large patch instead of two. In this case, I prefer to make > changes that are easier to check by automation (compiler and coccinelle). >
I prefer the offloading to automation, too. So I would vouch for keeping it as-is.