Re: [PATCH 00/23] Prepare to separate out a packed_ref_store
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- May 17, 2017, 18:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kaNxyh_3eJUZ7VRL673K4_nYD-KosAyv=grzWRCSzYT9Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170517134241.5zqaqptfgjrrrbju@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:05:23PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote: > >> This patch series is the next leg on a journey towards reading >> `packed-refs` using `mmap()`, the most interesting aspect of which is >> that we will often be able to avoid having to read the whole >> `packed-refs` file if we only need a subset of references. >> >> The first leg of the journey was separating out the reference cache >> into a separate module [1]. That branch is already merged to master. >> >> This patch series prepares the ground for separating out a >> `packed_ref_store`, but doesn't yet take that step. (As you can see, >> it's a long enough patch series already!) It's kind of a grab bag of >> cleanup patches plus work to decouple the packed-refs handling code >> from the rest of `files_ref_store`. Some highlights: > > I dropped a few minor comments in individual patches, but it all looks > good to me up through patch 22. Your description in patch 23 makes > sense, but I was too frazzled by the end to carefully review the code > itself for that patch. I'll try to come back to it later.
Same here.
Thanks, Stefan