Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-worktree: use working tree for trees on the file system

> Hi,
>
> Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> If I recall correctly, "worktree" is the feature/command, and
>> "working tree" is an instance in the file system, even when you only
>> have one working tree.
>
> I'm not sure I agree with this distinction.  "worktree" is just a
> short name for "working tree".
>
> Unfortunately gitglossary(7) doesn't make this clear at all --- it
> uses the term worktree a few times (and appears to mean "working tree"
> when it does --- e.g.
>
>         Pathspecs are used on the command line of [...] and many other
>         commands to limit the scope of operations to some subset of
>         the tree or worktree.
>
> ) but never defines it.
>