Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] [GSoC] remove_subtree(): reimplement using iterators

> Daniel Ferreira <bnmvco@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I think this is the closest to a final version we've ever gotten. I
>> followed all of Michael and Stefan's suggestions on top of v8, and with
>> Michael's endorsement made dir_iterator_begin() return NULL and set
>> errno appropriately in case of an error.
>>
>> On second thought, maybe the extra code complexity required from
>> dir_iterator_begin()'s callers might be actually an advantage as
>> dir_iterator grows to tackle more complex dir traversing challenges on
>> Git. After all, we might want some special behavior depending on what
>> the given `path` is instead of always considering it valid and later
>> behaving as if it was an empty directory.
>>
>> Thanks again for the reviews.
>
> I had a bit of trouble with phrasing here and there, but other than
> that the series was a pleasant read overall.
>
> Will queue, anticipating "Yeah, this is good as the final version"
> comments from reviewers.